South Carolina Amendment 1
South Carolinian anti-same-sex marriage constitutional amendment
| November 7, 2006 |
Marriage Act
Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
 Yes | 829,360 | 77.97% |
 No | 234,316 | 22.03% |
| Total votes | 1,063,676 | 100.00% |
| Yes 90%–100% 80%–90% 70%–80% 60%–70%
|
South Carolina Amendment 1 of 2006 amended the South Carolina Constitution to make it unconstitutional for the U.S. state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The referendum was approved by 78% of voters.[1] Unlike the other sixteen such state amendments, South Carolina's explicitly disavows any effort to prevent private contracts between same-sex partners from being recognized[2]—Virginia being the only state to do so.[3][4]
| Elections in South Carolina | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | ||||||||
| | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
The text of South Carolina Amendment 1 states:
A marriage between one man and one woman is the only lawful domestic union that shall be valid or recognized in this State. This State and its political subdivisions shall not create a legal status, right, or claim respecting any other domestic union, however denominated. This State and its political subdivisions shall not recognize or give effect to a legal status, right, or claim created by another jurisdiction respecting any other domestic union, however denominated. Nothing in this section shall impair any right or benefit extended by the State or its political subdivisions other than a right or benefit arising from a domestic union that is not valid or recognized in this State. This section shall not prohibit or limit parties, other than the State or its political subdivisions, from entering into contracts or other legal instruments.[2]
See also
References
- ^ CNN.com Election 2006 - Ballot Measures Accessed 14 December 2006.
- ^ a b p.24 No.54 edition of the Journal of the Senate of the State of South Carolina. Archived 2008-10-03 at the Wayback Machine State of South Carolina. April 2005. Accessed 06 January 2007.
- ^ Test case is urged by ACLU Archived 2013-01-02 at archive.today, by Bill Freehling, The Free Lance-Star, November 21, 2006. Accessed 15 December 2006.
- ^ Potential Impact of the Proposed Marshall/Newman Amendment to the Virginia Constitution Archived 2017-03-20 at the Wayback Machine, by Melissa Glidden, Brenda Jackson-Cooper, and Leslie Nickel, Arnold & Porter, LLP, August 11, 2006. Accessed 15 December 2006.
External links
- The Money Behind the 2006 Marriage Amendments -- National Institute on Money in State Politics
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General unions |
| ||
| Marriage | |||
| Civil unions and domestic partnerships |
| ||
| |||
  | This South Carolina elections-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e
